home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1990-06-24 | 5.9 KB | 136 lines | [TEXT/GEOL] |
- Apple Confidential / Need to Know
-
-
- Windows 3.0 Announcement Positioning
-
-
- This document was developed by Jim Davis, director of System Software Product
- Marketing. It's designed to help you understand how to position Macintosh
- relative to Windows 3.
-
-
- Situation Analysis
-
- On May 22, Microsoft plans to introduce Windows 3.0, a graphical user interface
- for MS-DOS computers. The announcement is being watched by the entire computer
- industry.
-
- Some of the preannouncement articles position Windows against Macintosh. They
- say that it’s a GUI (graphical user interface) war that Microsoft will win
- because it is selling a “Mac-like” interface that can be used on any clone.
- They claim this destroys the major differentiation between Macs and PCs. They
- further conclude that Apple will have a hard time selling Macs which, in turn,
- could mean poor financial performance for the company.
-
- But, that’s not the only story the press has discovered. There is also a
- growing number of articles that focus on the impact Windows 3.0 could have in
- the Intel-based world. If Windows 3.0 is successful, it further delays
- adoption of OS/2 and Presentation Manager as the new industry standard.
- Finally, there are some articles and consultants that suggest both Windows and
- Macintosh will increase in share over time, at the expense of plain DOS and
- OS/2.
-
-
- Objectives
-
- • Move Macintosh away from the center of the Windows 3.0 target.
- • Move discussion onto our terms where Apple wins.
- • Blunt the enthusiasm for Windows 3.0.
-
-
- Tone
-
- Our strategy is to exhibit confidence and not undertake any activities that
- could be perceived as defensive. As much as possible, our comments should take
- the tone of an “industry observation.” We will educate the infrastructure as
- much as possible before the introduction to allow others to tell our story for
- us.
-
-
-
- Major Messages
-
-
- 1. Windows 3.0 further confuses the Intel-based world.
-
- Windows 3.0 is definitely an improvement over previous versions of Windows and
- will be valuable to many DOS users. However, it also impacts the Intel-based
- world in several ways.
-
- First, it will extend the life of DOS and therefore delay the adoption of OS/2
- as the new Intel-based industry standard. That’s obviously a blow to IBM. It
- also gives Intel-oriented developers one more major platform for which to
- develop, further stretching their development resources and slowing OS/2
- applications development as well.
-
- Second, Windows 3.0 should be viewed as a transition product only -- meaning
- customer growth paths are uncertain. Will there be a Windows 4? Or will OS/2
- come of age in the future, obsoleting current hardware and software?
-
- Finally, DOS users already have many confusing choices to make, and Windows 3.0
- adds another. It is one more DOS interface that customers will have to
- evaluate, in addition to several revisions of OS/2 with and without
- Presentation Manager, the two earlier versions of Windows, 30 or more DOS
- shells and several versions of MS-DOS.
-
-
- 2. Windows 3.0 moves the industry battleground to our turf -- and when
- comparisons are made between Macintosh and DOS with Windows, we win.
-
- We must communicate to the industry (press, customers, resellers, consultants
- and the financial community) that another milestone is passing -- the death of
- the command line interface. Microsoft is forcing the market to compete on our
- terms. That can be advantageous for Apple. When customers take a serious look
- at a graphics-environment computer, they will find many advantages with the
- Macintosh (see below). Some industry analysts are even suggesting that both
- Windows and Macintosh will substantially increase in market share, at the
- expense of plain DOS and planned OS/2 migration.
-
-
- 3. Macintosh’s differentiation goes far beyond its graphical user interface.
-
- There are many reasons why Macintosh remains superior to Windows 3.0, but here
- are four of them:
-
- • First, only Macintosh has a unified architecture. We design everything
- ourselves -- hardware, software and built-in networking. What this means to
- users is that new innovations can be incorporated quickly and easily into their
- systems.
-
- • Second, Macintosh has a much smoother growth path. All Macintoshes --
- including the very first Macs introduced in 1984 -- will be able to run
- Macintosh’s latest system software, System 7, requiring only an increase in
- memory. What this means to users is protection of their investments -- in
- hardware, software and training. In contrast, users with Intel-based machines
- face major hardware upgrades, which are both complicated and expensive.
-
- • Third, Macintosh is the easiest personal computer to use in the world. That
- won't change, because ease of use can't be added on as an afterthought. We
- build ease of use into everything we do -- resulting in simple set up and
- configuration, easy integration of Macintosh on networks with peripherals and
- CPU’s from other vendors, and developer tools to create consistent applications
- for users. What this means to users is much better productivity.
-
- • Fourth, Macintosh has a big lead in graphics-oriented applications. Over
- the last six years, we have accumulated a library of thousands of applications
- -- the largest library of graphically-based applications in the world. Apple’s
- competitors won’t be able to match that quickly, if at all. What this means to
- users is the freedom of choice to pick the programs that work best for them.
-
-
- Points to Remember
-
- - Never compare Windows 3.0 to System 7. (If direct comparisons must be
- made, make them with System 6). System 7 goes far beyond Windows 3. Its real
- competitor is OS/2.
- - Always position Windows on top of DOS -- ie: Windows for DOS.
- Remind people that DOS is a dated operating system and that Windows 3.0 is
- simply a new paint job. Correct anyone who suggests that Windows 3.0 is an
- operating system.
- - Remind naysayers of earlier predictions of disaster for Apple that
- never materialized (PCjr, NeXT, OS/2, Presentation Manger)
-
-
-
-
-